Volume 1, Issue 2 (9-2025)
مکتب نقدنظر 2025, 1(2): 22-27 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Esmaeeldokht M. The Tendency for Distinction through the Lens of Bourdieu’s Theories and the Formation of Kitsch in Contemporary Iranian Architecture. , مکتب نقدنظر. 2025; 1 (2) :22-27
URL: http://jcr-sj.com/article-1-31-en.html
URL: http://jcr-sj.com/article-1-31-en.html
Ph.D. in Landscape Architecture/ Lecturer in Shiraz University of Arts
Abstract: (1276 Views)
There is a consensus among experts that the form of contemporary Iranian architecture has become disordered and is devoid of the rich culture of traditional architecture, and the result of the aforementioned discontinuity has been the facades of contemporary Iranian cities. Perhaps, in a gradual and process-oriented approach, sociological criticism of public taste and the basis of the formation and tendency of public taste can be the most effective approach from this point of view. In this regard, the current critique draws upon Bourdieu's distinction theory to seek the basic and extensive causes of the desires of the employer and the architect as the main actors in the field of architecture. It also considers them as factors shaping the image of contemporary Iranian cities. The results of the review indicate that employers have attempted to address a tendency for similarity in distinct ways in the upper class with low cultural capital but high economic capital and the middle class with low cultural capital but medium economic capital. Similarly, with the occupation of the architectural field by architects with low cultural capital who need to satisfy the sense of distinction in the mentioned classes, the tendency of public taste in the architectural form has changed. As a result, as time has elapsed, the formation of the image of contemporary cities has experienced discontinuity and chaos.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
General
Received: 2025/09/6 | Accepted: 2025/09/1 | Published: 2025/09/1
Received: 2025/09/6 | Accepted: 2025/09/1 | Published: 2025/09/1
References
1. اجتهد نژاد کاشانی، سید سالار و پرویزاجلالی، حسین. (1393). کندوکاو نظری-مفهومی درباره توسعه فرهنگی از منظر جامعه شناسی. فصلناه علوم اجتماعی (64): 35- 72.
2. بوردیو، پیر. (1395). تمایز، نق اجتماعی قضاوت های ذوقی. ترجمه حسن چاوشیان. تهران: نشر ثالث.
3. رحمتی، محمد مهدی و مرادخانی، همایون و سلطانی گردفرامرزی، مهدی و مرادی، سجاد. (1393). هویت اجتماعی و مقاومت فرهنگی؛ مطالعه مصرف کالاهای فرهنگی غیرمجاز در شهر تهران. مجله مطالعات جامعه شناختی. 19 (2): 85- 111.
4. قاسمی، یارمحمد و نامدار جویمی، احسان. (1393). بررسی رابطه سرمایه فرهنگی و سرمایه نمادین فرهنگی (مطالعه موردی: دانشجویان دانشگاه دولتی ایلام). فرهنگ ایلام. 15 (44 و 45): 7-21.
5. محمدی، فردین و خالق پناه، کمال و نوغانی دخت بهمنی، محسن و کرمانی، مهدی. (1398). تکوین تکثر تمایز در میدان، عادت واره و سرمایه: صورت بندی نظریه توسعه از دیدگاه بوردیو. فصلنامه توسعه انسانی. 13 (4): 55-90.
6. معنوی راد، میترا و مرسلی تبریزی، فاطمه. (1394). بررسی رویکرد کیچ در عرصه ارتباطات بصری. نشریه هنرهای زیبا. 20 (3): 5-16.
7. ممتاز، فریده. (1383). معرفی مفهوم طبقه از دیدگاه بوردیو. پژوهشنامه علوم انسانی. شماره (41- 42): 149-160.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |