logo
Volume 1, Issue 5 (3-2026)                   مکتب نقدنظر 2026, 1(5): 12-13 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

nikoei A. Critique of Western Psychoanalysis; The Importance of Native Myths in the Analysis of the Human Psyche. , مکتب نقدنظر. 2026; 1 (5) : 5
URL: http://jcr-sj.com/article-1-54-en.html
Nazar Research Institute of Art, Architecture and Urban Planning
Abstract:   (902 Views)
This note examines the structural relationship between "myth" and "modern psychoanalysis" with a critical-analytical approach and shows that myth in the psychoanalytic tradition is not a literary element but a "conceptual model" for understanding unconscious conflicts. Referring to the works of "Sigmund Freud", the author shows that myths such as "Oedipus", "Narcissus", "Medusa" and "Persephone" have become compact models in the Freudian system for explaining concepts such as the conflict between desire and law, libidinal investment, castration anxiety and the cycle of loss. Next, by analyzing the views of "Carl Gustav Jung", the concept of "archetype" is introduced as a priori structure of the psyche that crystallizes in the form of various myths and formulates the process of individuation. In this note, we argue that, despite the usefulness of these models, the mythological foundation of classical psychoanalysis is largely based on ancient Greek myths and is therefore indigenous to the West. Accordingly, the direct transfer of these models to other cultural contexts may lead to a reduction in meaning or misunderstanding, since each myth is rooted in a network of specific historical values ​​and experiences. Finally, we emphasize the need for “indigenous psychoanalysis”; an approach in which psychological analysis is shaped by the myths and cultural narratives of each nation. Such an approach can make the understanding of unconscious conflicts and forces within the historical-cultural framework of each society more precise, meaningful, and interpretively efficient. Finally, in this article, we seek to answer the main question: Can the psychoanalytic model based on Greek myths, which was established in the works of Freud and then in the theoretical system of Jung, be considered universally valid for all cultures?
Article number: 5
Full-Text [PDF 172 kb]   (346 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/02/24 | Accepted: 2026/02/26 | Published: 2026/03/17

References
1. ـ برونر، فرانکو؛ ۱۳۷۰. فرهنگ توصیفی اصطلاحات روان‌شناسی. ترجمة مهشید یاسائی و فرزانه طاهری. تهران. طرح نو.
2. ـ پلودن، لیدی و دیگران؛ 1351. اساطیر یونان. ترجمه محمود نژد، تهران، بی‌نشر.
3. ـ سوفوکل؛ 1402. افسانه‌های تبای، ترجمه شاهرخ مسکوب، تهران، انتشارات خوارزمی.
4. ـ فروید، زیگموند؛ ۱۹۱۷. «سوگواری و مالیخولیا». The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, جلد ۱۴: ۲۳۷-۲۵۸. دسترسی در: https://pep-web.org/search/document/SE.014.0237A
5. On the Sexual Theories of Children» 1908. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud Vol IX Norman Brown Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytic Meaning of History, London: Sphere Books 1968, p. 118

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.