Tehran University, tehran
Abstract: (201 Views)
Despite the expansion of place-based approaches in architecture and urban planning, there is still no coherent explanation of how the transition from objective space to lived space occurs. Using the method of conceptual-philosophical analysis and documentary study, this article, with a critical and philosophical approach, examines and criticizes the evolution of the concept of objectivity from a physical and quantitative perception to intersubjective, social, and embodied formulations. The argument of the article shows that objectivity, in its broadest form, is a necessary condition for the knowledge of space, but it is not a sufficient condition for the realization of place; because it still remains in the logic of distanced knowledge. In contrast, relying on the concept of "encounter", the transition from space to place is explained as a categorical break in the type of human relationship with the environment; a break in which the human is transformed from the position of an external observer to a participant present in the environment. Accordingly, the “Location-space-place” pyramid is reinterpreted as an analytical framework that considers “location” as a remnant of classical objectivity, “space” as an expanded objectivity, and “place” as the point of encounter. This framework is examined against competing approaches and in two practical examples of the spatial-centric error in planning and the historicist error in restoration. The main finding of the article is that the transition from space to place is possible not through the accumulation of objective data, but through a change in the type of human-environment relationship, the perception of space, and the recognition of the relationships that shape it.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2026/09/1 | Accepted: 2026/10/2 | Published: 2026/11/1
Received: 2026/09/1 | Accepted: 2026/10/2 | Published: 2026/11/1
References
1. Agnew, J. A. (1987). Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. Allen & Unwin.
2. Andersen, N. B. (2024). New phenomenology in architecture: Embodied environmental communication for meaningful situations. Architectural Research Quarterly. [DOI:10.1017/s1359135524000083]
3. Başaran, A. (2024). Avicenna on place: A phenomenological approach. Temaşa Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi. [DOI:10.55256/temasa.1467117]
4. Böhme, G. (2017). The Aesthetics of Atmospheres (J.-P. Thibaud, Ed.). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315538181]
5. Brentano, F. (1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, & L. L. McAlister, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1874)
6. Casey, E. S. (1997). The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. University of California Press.
7. Descartes, R. (1996). Meditations on First Philosophy (J. Cottingham, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1641) [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511805028.006]
8. Gallagher, S. (2023). Embodied and enactive approaches to cognition. Cmbrige university press. [DOI:10.1017/9781009209793]
9. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927)
10. Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W. R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). George Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1913)
11. Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781) [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511804649]
12. Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Duquesne University Press.
13. Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding (P. H. Nidditch, Ed.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1690) [DOI:10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020]
14. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
15. Malpas, J. (2018). Place and experience: A philosophical topography (Updated ed.). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315265445]
16. Meinong, A. (1960). On the theory of objects. In R. M. Chisholm (Ed.), Realism and the background of phenomenology (I. Levi, D. B. Terrell, & R. M. Chisholm, Trans., pp. 76-117). Free Press. (Original work published 1904)
17. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)
18. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.
19. Relph, E. (2023). Place and Placelessness (50th anniversary ed.). Sage. (Original work published 1976)
20. Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press.
21. Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world (G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
22. Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001]
23. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
24. UNESCO World Heritage Committee. (2021). State of Conservation Report: Venice and its Lagoon. UNESCO.
25. Waldenfels, B. (2022). Phenomenology of the alien: Basic concepts. Northwestern University Press.
26. Yaffe, Y. C., & Langenthal, E. (2025). Depth and embodiment: Being present in architectural space as an experience of meaning. Philosophies, 10(2),33. [DOI:10.3390/philosophies10020033]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |