logo
Volume 1, Issue 3 (11-2025)                   مکتب نقدنظر 2025, 1(3): 0-0 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

amani H. A Critique of Seyyed Hossein Nasr’s Views on Islamic Illumination and Calligraphy. , مکتب نقدنظر. 2025; 1 (3) : 4
URL: http://jcr-sj.com/article-1-38-en.html
Abstract:   (1254 Views)
From the Traditionalist perspective, calligraphy is regarded as the noblest and most distinguished of the Islamic arts, serving as the foundation for the visual arts in the Islamic world. The views of Seyyed Hossein Nasr, published in his essay “The Spiritual Message of Islamic Calligraphy,” have been widely adopted by researchers as established fact. However, it appears that in several respects, his assertions are inconsistent with the historical trajectory of the evolution of illumination and calligraphy. Therefore, the present critique, employing a descriptive-analytical approach and a comparative method, seeks to answer the following question by examining historical evidence—such as surviving scripts, inscriptions, and manuscript sources—and comparing the collected data: How do Seyyed Hossein Nasr’s views on Islamic illumination and calligraphy align with the historical course of the development and evolution of script and calligraphy?
By comparing Seyyed Hossein Nasr’s views on traditional Islamic illumination and calligraphy with historical written sources and extant examples, it becomes evident that his opinions on these arts are, in certain cases, incompatible with their recorded history. It thus appears that the origin of Nasr’s thought is based less on history and more on futuwwat-nāmehs (manuals of chivalry) and treatises on calligraphy and illumination. Some of the content in these texts, articulated in general and esoteric (abstract) terms, was primarily formulated and expanded to legitimize the status and significance of calligraphy within Islamic civilization as a vessel for recording the divine revelation.
 
Article number: 4
Full-Text [PDF 157 kb]   (536 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2025/08/29 | Accepted: 2025/11/1 | Published: 2025/11/1

References
1. ـ امانی، حجت. (1404). نقد آرای سنت‌‌گرایان در باب خوش‌نویسی اسلامی، باغ نظر، 22 (148).
2. ـ سراج شیرازی، یعقوب‌بن‌حسن. (1376). تحفه‌المحبین (در آئین خوش‌نویسی و لطایف معنوی آن). ایرج افشار، کرامت رعناحسینی، محمدتقی دانش‌پژوه. تهران: مؤسسة نشر میراث مکتوب.
3. ـ محمدی، محمد. (1374). فرهنگ ایرانی پیش از اسلام و آثار آن در تمدن اسلامی و ادبیات عربی. تهران: نشرتوس.
4. ـ نصر، سیدحسین. (1375). هنر و معنویت اسلامی. ترجمه: رحیم قاسمیان. ترجمه: دفتر مطالعات دینی هنر، تهران.
5. ـ امانی،حجت. (1401). بررسی تأثیر حروفیه بر رساله‌های خوش‌نویسان (با تأکید بر قوانین الخطوط محمود بن محمد)، همایش دوسالانه خوش‌نویسی.
6. ـ حسینی، عبدالرضا. (1402). مسوده: درآمدی تاریخی به جامعه‌شناسی خط در ایران. فرهنگستان هنر، پژوهشکده هنر.
7. ـ مایل هروی، نجیب. (1372).کتاب‌آرایی در تمدن اسلامی. مشهد: آستان قدس رضوی.
8. ـ نصر، سیدحسین. (1374). پیام روحانی خوش‌نویسی در اسلام. مشرق. شهریور و مهر، شماره 6.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.