This editorial critically analyzes and pathologizes the fifteen-year experience of developing pedestrian streets in Iranian cities, raising the fundamental question of why, despite diverse implementations, these projects are often stripped of the essence of "pedestrian life" and reduced to soulless "pedestrian pathways." The core issue lies in the departure from the philosophy of the pedestrian's presence in the city and the dominance of reductionist approaches. The critique is directed not at the very concept of pedestrian presence, but at how it is understood and realized. According to the author, pedestrian projects in Iran face three fundamental challenges: first, the reduction of pedestrianization to mere hardscaping within a traffic-centric framework; second, the absence of authentic goal-setting and the predominance of the logic of spectacle over the logic of lived urban life; and third, the profound gap between the lived perception of the public and the self-referential ideology of urban managers and consultants. Although seemingly independent, these three issues are deeply intertwined in practice, resulting in spaces labeled as "pedestrian streets" yet entirely devoid of "pedestrian life."

Keywords: Pedestrian walkway, urban landscape, pedestrian lifestyle, urban space

     

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

---

---